Why is the Administration ignoring the advice of our military? This only bolsters my claim that this Administration is condoning the types of acts that happened at Abu Ghraib when they continue to keep a torture policy in place which harms our credibility as a free and Democratic nation.
More from the NY Times.
WASHINGTON, July 27 – Senior military lawyers lodged vigorous and detailed dissents in early 2003 as an administration legal task force concluded that President Bush had authority as commander in chief to order harsh interrogations of prisoners at GuantÃƒÆ’Ã‚Â¡namo Bay, Cuba, newly disclosed documents show.
Despite the military lawyers’ warnings, the task force concluded that military interrogators and their commanders would be immune from prosecution for torture under federal and international law because of the special character of the fight against terrorism.
In memorandums written by several senior uniformed lawyers in each of the military services as the legal review was under way, they had urged a sharply different view and also warned that the position eventually adopted by the task force could endanger American service members.
So how did these documents see the light of day?
The memorandums were declassified and released last week in response to a request from Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina. Mr. Graham made the request after hearings in which officers representing the military’s judge advocates general acknowledged having expressed concerns over interrogation policies.
The documents include one written by the deputy judge advocate general of the Air Force, Maj. Gen. Jack L. Rives, advising the task force that several of the “more extreme interrogation techniques, on their face, amount to violations of domestic criminal law” as well as military law.
General Rives added that many other countries were likely to disagree with the reasoning used by Justice Department lawyers about immunity from prosecution. Instead, he said, the use of many of the interrogation techniques “puts the interrogators and the chain of command at risk of criminal accusations abroad.”
We have to start being honest about this issue, and I hope the Administration starts addressing it immediately.